Check OpenCode pricing separately
There is no single fixed monthly rate in the currently tracked cost model.
Review official cost documentationOpen-source terminal coding agent
OpenCode providers, local models, and alternatives
Open-source terminal coding agent with configurable providers, local-model support, specialized agents, and granular tool permissions.
Decision focus: Separate the open-source client from provider usage, hosted plans, and local compute, then test permissions and repository-shared configuration before team rollout.
Verified quick facts
OpenCode at a glance
Only source-tracked facts are shown.
- Billing model
- open source plus provider usage
- Fixed monthly price
- Not a single fixed rate
- Cost basis
- Plan access, provider usage, credits, or local compute
- Workflow
- Terminal agent, Multi-provider, Local models, Subagents
- Integrations
- 75+ providers, MCP, Agent skills, Custom tools
- Source checked
- 2026-07-18
Workflow fit to test
- Terminal agent: worth testing with representative repository work before rollout.
- Multi-provider: worth testing with representative repository work before rollout.
- Local models: worth testing with representative repository work before rollout.
- Subagents: worth testing with representative repository work before rollout.
Do not treat workflow labels as a productivity conclusion.
Administration and privacy review
- Configuration can be committed with a repository
- Agent and command permissions can be scoped by pattern
- Provider credentials and selected execution paths determine where prompts and code are processed.
Limits and caveats
What to verify before rollout
Public limits and plan terms can change.
- Software access and model usage are separate cost layers.
- Provider support does not mean every model has identical tool behavior.
- Local models require user-supplied hardware and setup.